{"id":285,"date":"2012-11-11T06:59:39","date_gmt":"2012-11-11T06:59:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=285"},"modified":"2013-10-20T02:56:19","modified_gmt":"2013-10-20T02:56:19","slug":"cirkevni-restituce-ano-ale-jejich-stavajici-podoba-ohrozuje-cr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=285","title":{"rendered":"C\u00edrkevn\u00ed restituce ano, ale jejich st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed podoba ohro\u017euje \u010cR"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i>  1,521 total views<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Na sv\u00e9 p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00ed sch\u016fzi bude poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna rozhodovat o c\u00edrkevn\u00edch restituc\u00edch. Modleme se (a mysl\u00edm to up\u0159\u00edmn\u011b), aby nepro\u0161ly. Ud\u011blejte si \u010das a p\u0159e\u010dt\u011bte si p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 citace ze z\u00e1kona, kter\u00e9 potvrzuj\u00ed nejhor\u0161\u00ed obavy: Ano, k prolomen\u00ed hranice \u00fanora 1948 doch\u00e1z\u00ed, a ano, p\u0159\u00edm\u011br z\u00e1kona s tunelem je zcela nam\u00edst\u011b. Posu\u010fte sami.<\/p>\n

\n
\"C\u00edrkevn\u00ed<\/a>

C\u00edrkevn\u00ed restituce ano, ale jejich st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed podoba ohro\u017euje \u010cR<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

C\u00edrkevn\u00ed restituce ano, ale proboha ne takto!<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u010cesk\u00e1 republika zah\u00e1jila restituce v devades\u00e1t\u00fdch letech. Zp\u011bt dostala majetky \u0161lechta a dal\u0161\u00ed \u017eadatel\u00e9. Ostatn\u011b i \u010cSSD z\u00edskala zp\u011bt Lidov\u00fd d\u016fm v restitu\u010dn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed. C\u00edrkve byly zat\u00edm z tohoto procesu a\u017e na v\u00edcem\u00e9n\u011b drobn\u00e9 v\u00fdjimky vy\u0148aty. Existuje-li rovnost p\u0159ed z\u00e1konem (a ta mus\u00ed existovat), mus\u00ed se st\u00e1t vyrovnat i s c\u00edrkvemi. Ostatn\u011b \u00fastavn\u00ed soud n\u00e1rok c\u00edrkv\u00ed na restituce potvrdil. A to nen\u00ed mali\u010dkost. Znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee st\u00e1t by tento probl\u00e9m m\u011bl za\u010d\u00edt \u0159e\u0161it urychlen\u011b: hroz\u00ed mu vlivem nevypo\u0159\u00e1dan\u00fdch restituc\u00ed soudy a i mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed arbitr\u00e1\u017ee. Starostov\u00e9 a zastupitel\u00e9 obc\u00ed dob\u0159e v\u011bd\u00ed, \u017ee vlivem nevypo\u0159\u00e1dan\u00fdch restituc\u00ed jsou b\u00fdval\u00e9 c\u00edrkevn\u00ed pozemky st\u00e1le blokov\u00e1ny a je tak \u00fa\u010dinn\u011b blokov\u00e1n rozvoj t\u011bchto \u00fazem\u00ed. Proti f\u00e9rov\u00e9mu vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed s c\u00edrkvemi nem\u00e1m nic, naopak po n\u011bm vol\u00e1m.\u00a0St\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed podoba z\u00e1kona o\u00a0majetkov\u00e9m vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed s \u00a0c\u00edrkvemi<\/a>\u00a0a n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00fdmi spole\u010dnostmi je v\u0161ak do nebe volaj\u00edc\u00ed nehor\u00e1znost.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Hranice 25.2.1948 je explicitn\u011b prolomena a ne \u017ee ne.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A\u010dkoliv vl\u00e1da neust\u00e1le tvrd\u00ed opak, hranice 25.2.1948 je prolomena. V z\u00e1kon\u011b je to jasn\u011b uvedeno, cituji:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

“\u00a7 5<\/em>
\nSkute\u010dnosti vedouc\u00ed k majetkov\u00fdm k\u0159ivd\u00e1m\u00a0<\/em>
\nOdn\u011bt\u00ed v\u011bci bez n\u00e1hrady postupem podle z\u00e1kona\u00a0\u010d. 142\/1947 Sb<\/strong>., o revisi prvn\u00ed\u00a0<\/em>
\npozemkov\u00e9 reformy, nebo podle z\u00e1kona \u010d. 46\/1948 Sb., o nov\u00e9 pozemkov\u00e9 reform\u011b\u00a0<\/em>
\n(trval\u00e9 \u00faprav\u011b vlastnictv\u00ed k zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 a lesn\u00ed p\u016fd\u011b)…”<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sta\u010d\u00ed si dohledat tento z\u00e1kon. Prvn\u00ed majetkov\u00e1 reforma je ze dne 11.07.1947,\u00a0\u010c\u00e1stka 065\/1947,\u00a0\u00da\u010dinnost od\u00a012.08.1947.\u00a0<\/strong>Hranice roku 48 je tedy explicitn\u011b prolomena.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tato skute\u010dnost m\u00e1 samoz\u0159ejm\u011b ohromn\u00e9 dopady. Pokud c\u00edrkve dostanou vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed ke star\u0161\u00edmu datu ne\u017e ostatn\u00ed restitutuenti, nepochybn\u011b to povede k obnoven\u00ed spor\u016f i ostatn\u00edch restituent\u016f.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee \u00fastavn\u00ed soud a i dal\u0161\u00ed soudy mus\u00ed respektovat rovnost p\u0159ed z\u00e1konem, je podle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru naprosto jist\u00e9, \u017ee by toto zp\u016fsobilo nov\u00e9 kolo restituc\u00ed. – Tj. nov\u00e9 kolo vracen\u00ed majetku \u0161lecht\u011b a dal\u0161\u00edm \u017eadatel\u016fm. Nemohla by tato zm\u011bna sv\u00fdm rozsahem zp\u016fsobit naru\u0161en\u00ed \u00fazemn\u00ed celistvosti \u010cR?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Mechanimus vracen\u00ed majetku je trestuhodn\u00fd<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Posu\u010fte sami, cituji:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

“\u00a7 9\u00a0<\/em>
\nPostup p\u0159i vyd\u00e1n\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 nemovitosti\u00a0<\/em>
\na) p\u0159ipoj\u00ed listinu nebo uvede d\u016fvody, z nich\u017e vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee je spln\u011bna n\u011bkter\u00e1 ze skute\u010dnost\u00ed\u00a0<\/em>
\npodle \u00a7 5;\u00a0tato skute\u010dnost se m\u00e1 za prok\u00e1zanou, nen\u00ed-li prok\u00e1z\u00e1n opak<\/strong>…”<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tzn. d\u016fkazn\u00ed b\u0159emeno je na \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edc\u00edch. Lze o\u010dek\u00e1vat, \u017ee se budou za pr\u00e1va \u010cR b\u00edt jako lvi? Kdy\u017e nav\u00edc je\u0161t\u011b budou zcela zavaleni tis\u00edci \u017e\u00e1dostmi a budou sv\u00e1z\u00e1ni lh\u016ftami, do nich\u017e mus\u00ed rozhodnout, tj. prok\u00e1zat opak?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Je\u0161t\u011b hor\u0161\u00ed je situace u movit\u00fdch p\u0159edm\u011bt\u016f<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Op\u011bt cituji:\u00a0“\u00a7 10\u00a0Postup p\u0159i vyd\u00e1n\u00ed jin\u00e9 v\u011bci ne\u017e zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9 nemovitosti<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

p\u0159ipoj\u00ed listinu nebo uvede d\u016fvody, z nich\u017e vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee je spln\u011bna n\u011bkter\u00e1 ze skute\u010dnost\u00ed\u00a0<\/em>
\npodle \u00a7 5;\u00a0tato skute\u010dnost se m\u00e1 za prok\u00e1zanou, nen\u00ed-li prok\u00e1z\u00e1n opak<\/strong>.”<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Op\u011bt stejn\u00e9 lakonick\u00e9, odbyt\u00e9 pravidlo. Tady jsem ov\u0161em je\u0161t\u011b vypla\u0161en\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. Jak m\u016f\u017ee \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edk v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nap\u0159. n\u00e1roku na n\u011bjak\u00fd star\u00fd obraz dok\u00e1zat, \u017ee jej c\u00edrkev nevlastnila? Movit\u00e9 p\u0159edm\u011bty p\u0159ece nejsou nikde evidov\u00e1ny. A z\u00e1kon hovo\u0159\u00ed jasn\u011b. Kdy\u017e \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edkneprok\u00e1\u017ee\u00a0<\/strong>opak,\u00a0mus\u00ed v\u011bc vydat.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Samotn\u00fd proces n\u00e1rokov\u00e1n\u00ed je v\u00edce ne\u017e v\u00e1gn\u00ed<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a7 7\u00a0<\/em>
\nVyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed v\u011bc\u00ed ostatn\u00edmi povinn\u00fdmi osobami<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed v\u011bc\u00ed ostatn\u00edmi povinn\u00fdmi osobami\u00a0<\/em>
\n(1) Povinn\u00e1 osoba podle \u00a7 4 p\u00edsm. c) a d) vyd\u00e1 opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9 osob\u011b nemovitou v\u011bc ve\u00a0<\/em>
\nvlastnictv\u00ed st\u00e1tu, […] pokud\u00a0<\/em>
\na)\u00a0funk\u010dn\u011b souvisela nebo souvis\u00ed s nemovitou v\u011bc\u00ed<\/strong>, kterou opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e1 osoba vlastn\u00ed, nebo\u00a0<\/em>
\nkter\u00e1 se vyd\u00e1v\u00e1 podle tohoto z\u00e1kona<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

b)\u00a0opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9 osob\u011b nebo jej\u00edmu pr\u00e1vn\u00edmu p\u0159edch\u016fdci v rozhodn\u00e9m obdob\u00ed slou\u017eila\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>
\nk duchovn\u00edm, pastora\u010dn\u00edm, charitativn\u00edm, zdravotnick\u00fdm, vzd\u011bl\u00e1vac\u00edm nebo\u00a0<\/em>
\nadministrativn\u00edm \u00fa\u010del\u016fm nebo jako obydl\u00ed duchovn\u00edch.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tedy pro vznik n\u00e1roku ani nemuselo existovat vlastnictv\u00ed. Funk\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ece souvis\u00ed v\u0161echno se v\u0161\u00edm. K vracen\u00ed posta\u010d\u00ed pouh\u00e9 u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed v\u011bci. To je p\u0159ece \u0161okuj\u00edc\u00ed. P\u0159esn\u011b toto napad\u00e1 i p\u0159edseda \u00fastavn\u00edho soudu Pavel Rychetsk\u00fd, kdy\u017e \u0159\u00edk\u00e1:\u00a0“K prolomen\u00ed hranice m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt nikoli proto, \u017ee to dikce z\u00e1kona umo\u017en\u00ed, ale proto, \u017ee neexistuje \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd syst\u00e9m kontroly, a dojde-li k vyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed exekutivn\u00ed cestou, pak se m\u016f\u017ee vydat cokoli.”<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Co v z\u00e1kon\u011b chyb\u00ed<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

V z\u00e1kon\u011b “chyb\u00ed” v\u011bta, \u017ee vr\u00e1cen\u00edm t\u011bchto majetk\u016f budou vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1ny v\u0161echny majetkov\u00e9 n\u00e1roky c\u00edrkv\u00ed. Naopak, explicitn\u011b je v preambuli z\u00e1kona naps\u00e1no, \u017ee se c\u00edlem vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed podle tohoto z\u00e1kona je, cituji:\u00a0“zm\u00edrnit \u00a0n\u00e1sledky\u00a0n\u011bkter\u00fdch<\/strong>\u00a0majetkov\u00fdch a jin\u00fdch k\u0159ivd.”<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

V z\u00e1kon\u011b chyb\u00ed stanoven\u00ed hranice 25.2.1948, p\u0159ed n\u00ed\u017e by restituce nem\u011bly j\u00edt. (Naopak, jak jsem psal v\u00fd\u0161e, explicitn\u011b je tato hranice prolomena definic\u00ed k\u0159ivd, kter\u00e9 z\u00e1kon \u0159e\u0161\u00ed.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Zp\u016fsob vyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed majetku je a\u017e trestuhodn\u011b zjednodu\u0161en. Naprosto nedomy\u0161len u movit\u00fdch p\u0159edm\u011bt\u016f.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pro\u010d nen\u00ed zm\u00edn\u011bn p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy t\u0159eba ur\u010dit\u00e1 movit\u00e1 v\u011bc existovala, byla v majetku c\u00edrkve, av\u0161ak nyn\u00ed nap\u0159. nen\u00ed zn\u00e1mo, kde se dan\u00e1 movitost nach\u00e1z\u00ed? Jak bude st\u00e1t podle navrhovatel\u016f nahrazovat tyto p\u0159\u00edpady?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pro\u010d nejsou z restituovan\u00fdch v\u011bc\u00ed vyjmuty pam\u00e1tky? Budeme odevzd\u00e1vat vz\u00e1cn\u00e9 tisky, historick\u00e9 obrazy apod?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vtipn\u00e1 citace z\u00e1kona na z\u00e1v\u011br<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a7 18\u00a0<\/em>
\nZ\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e1 ustanoven\u00ed\u00a0<\/em>
\nTento z\u00e1kon se nevztahuje na Katedr\u00e1lu sv. V\u00edta, V\u00e1clava a Vojt\u011bcha nach\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed se\u00a0<\/em>
\nna pozemku parc. \u010d. 4 o v\u00fdm\u011b\u0159e 5005m<\/em>
\na pozemku parc. \u010d. 5 o v\u00fdm\u011b\u0159e 502m<\/em>
\nv obci Praha,\u00a0<\/em>
\nkatastr\u00e1ln\u00edm \u00fazem\u00ed Hrad\u010dany, v\u010detn\u011b t\u011bchto pozemk\u016f. Tento z\u00e1kon se rovn\u011b\u017e nevztahuje na\u00a0<\/em>
\nbudovu \u010d.p. 37 nach\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed se na pozemku parc. \u010d. 85 o v\u00fdm\u011b\u0159e 776m<\/em>
\na na budovu \u010d.p. 48\u00a0<\/em>
\nnach\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed se na pozemku parc. \u010d. 6 o v\u00fdm\u011b\u0159e 982 m<\/em>
\nv obci Praha, katastr\u00e1ln\u00edm \u00fazem\u00ed\u00a0<\/em>
\nHrad\u010dany, v\u010detn\u011b t\u011bchto pozemk\u016f.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tak to tedy fakt d\u00edky. Jsem fakt r\u00e1d, \u017ee n\u00e1m z\u016fstanou alespo\u0148 Hrad\u010dany. Mil\u00e1 vl\u00e1do, fakt d\u00edky.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

V\u0161echno ostatn\u00ed je ale, tak mi to p\u0159ipad\u00e1, nejist\u00e9. Jestli restituce projdu v t\u00e9to podob\u011b, vid\u00edm\u00a0budoucnost \u00a0jasn\u011b \u010dern\u011b: Majetek \u010cR bude p\u0159eveden, skon\u010d\u00ed u tunel\u00e1\u0159\u016f, hn\u011bv podveden\u00fdch lid\u00ed bude obr\u00e1cen proti c\u00edrkvi, kter\u00e1 v cel\u00e9 t\u00e9to nechutn\u00e9 transakci vystupuje v roli b\u00edl\u00e9ho kon\u011b.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Zabra\u0148me tomu, dokud je \u010das.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

PS: Na t\u00e9ma restituc\u00ed jsem psal d\u0159\u00edve je\u0161t\u011b jeden \u010dl\u00e1nek. V t\u00e9 dob\u011b jsem reagoval na kampa\u0148 \u010cSSD a nem\u011bl jsem tenkr\u00e1t k dispozici n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona o c\u00edrkevn\u00edch restituc\u00edch, vych\u00e1zel jsem jen z informac\u00ed z tisku a z ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 diskuse v parlamentu \u010cR. Po p\u0159e\u010dten\u00ed p\u0159\u00edmo textu z\u00e1kona jsem sv\u016fj n\u00e1zor dost podstatn\u011b zm\u011bnil. Ale pokud V\u00e1s to zaj\u00edm\u00e1, m\u016fj p\u0159ede\u0161l\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek si m\u016f\u017eete p\u0159e\u010d\u00edst\u00a0zde<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>
<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 1,521 total views Na sv\u00e9 p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00ed sch\u016fzi bude poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna rozhodovat o c\u00edrkevn\u00edch restituc\u00edch. Modleme se (a mysl\u00edm to up\u0159\u00edmn\u011b), aby nepro\u0161ly. Ud\u011blejte si \u010das a p\u0159e\u010dt\u011bte si p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 citace ze z\u00e1kona, kter\u00e9 potvrzuj\u00ed nejhor\u0161\u00ed obavy: Ano, k prolomen\u00ed hranice \u00fanora 1948 doch\u00e1z\u00ed, a ano, p\u0159\u00edm\u011br z\u00e1kona s tunelem je zcela nam\u00edst\u011b. Posu\u010fte sami.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":286,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}