{"id":3478,"date":"2014-12-17T09:28:50","date_gmt":"2014-12-17T09:28:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=3478"},"modified":"2016-02-25T08:23:30","modified_gmt":"2016-02-25T08:23:30","slug":"jiri-gebert-ke-konceptu-metropolitniho-planu-kult-planovani-nebo-naprava-chyb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=3478","title":{"rendered":"Ji\u0159\u00ed Gebert: Ke konceptu Metropolitn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu. Kult pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo n\u00e1prava chyb ?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i>  1,265 total views<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

\"Jiri_GEBERT\"<\/a><\/p>\n

p\u0159etiskujeme p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek architekta Ji\u0159\u00edho Geberta<\/a> k Metropolitn\u00edmu pl\u00e1nu Prahy.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

IPR \u2013 Institut pra\u017esk\u00e9ho rozvoje nahradil\u00a0 URM- \u00datvar rozvoje m\u011bsta\u00a0 a ten \u00a0zase p\u016fvodn\u00ed UHA-\u00datvar hlavn\u00edho architekta. \u00a0P\u0159es ambici\u00f3zn\u00ed n\u00e1zvy jde v\u017edy o \u00fa\u0159ad, kter\u00fd dokumentuje, reguluje a\u00a0 p\u0159ipravuje v\u00fdstavbu m\u011bsta. V\u00a0ostatn\u00edch m\u011bstech Evropy se jmenuje prost\u011b odbor pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed stavebn\u00edho \u00fa\u0159adu- Bauamt, nebo anglicky Local\u00a0 commision. Metodiky pl\u00e1nu m\u011bst jsou si v\u0161ude podobn\u00e9. Praha se rozhodla pro \u00a0vlastn\u00ed experiment.<\/p>\n

Jako ka\u017ed\u00e9 slovo m\u00e1 i \u201erozvoj\u201c vice v\u00fdznam\u016f. Ani \u201edevelopment\u201c neznamen\u00e1\u00a0 automaticky zlep\u0161en\u00ed dosavadn\u00edho stavu. Zn\u00e1me rozvinutou chorobu i \u00a0rozvinutou\u00a0 teorii. Nen\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 novinka, \u017ee m\u011bsto je mno\u017eina \u00a0jednotek\u00a0 homo sapiens, kter\u00e1 tvo\u0159\u00ed \u017eiv\u00fd a dynamick\u00fd organizmus. Operace na \u017eiv\u00e9m t\u011ble by m\u011bly b\u00fdt uv\u00e1\u017een\u00e9 s detailn\u00ed znalost\u00ed a\u00a0 lokality a m\u00edstn\u00edho \u017eivota s\u00a0vn\u00edmav\u00fdm \u00a0pochopen\u00edm genia loci.\u00a0 Bohu\u017eel \u010desk\u00e9 m\u011bsto je od dob funkcionalizmu\u00a0 experiment\u00e1ln\u00ed laborato\u0159 a Metropolitn\u00ed pl\u00e1n v\u00a0trendu \u201em\u011bsto architekt\u016fm\u201c s\u00a0tich\u00fdm prim\u00e1tem\u00a0 silni\u010dn\u00ed infrastruktury pokra\u010duje. Pot\u0159eba kvality\u00a0 \u017eivota v\u00a0m\u011bst\u011b je zm\u011bna paradigmatu.\u00a0Obytn\u00e9 m\u011bsto nemohou diktovat\u00a0 \u00a0tunely,\u00a0 radi\u00e1ly , tangenty, p\u0159ivad\u011b\u010de\u00a0 a mosty optimalizovan\u00e9\u00a0 \u00fadajn\u011b pro automobil, ale hlavn\u011b pro\u00a0 stavebn\u00ed lobby.<\/p>\n

Ekonomov\u00e9 nebo sociologov\u00e9 m\u011b\u0159\u00ed \u00a0rozvoj, nap\u0159. \u017eivotn\u00ed \u00farovn\u00ed, “p\u0159\u00edjmy na hlavu”, odvody dan\u00ed nebo m\u00edrou zadlu\u017eenosti. Tak je Tunel Blanka uk\u00e1zka luxusu, dokonal\u00e9 stavby\u00a0 i finan\u010dn\u00ed\u00a0 katastrofy a pl\u00e1novac\u00edho selh\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9\u00a0 jde na konto tehdej\u0161\u00ed politick\u00e9 reprezentace m\u011bsta. Sociologicky se rozvoj m\u011b\u0159\u00ed t\u0159eba po\u010dtem vznikl\u00fdch pracovn\u00edch m\u00edst nebo soci\u00e1ln\u00edm slo\u017een\u00edm populace.<\/p>\n

Svoje politick\u00e9 \u00a0z\u00e1stupce jsme zvolili proto, aby rozhodovali o v\u011bcech rozvoje m\u011bsta v\u00a0souladu s\u00a0ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm z\u00e1jmem. Ti, kdo si tento z\u00e1jem vylo\u017eili jako zprost\u0159edkov\u00e1n\u00ed lukrativn\u00edch lokalit sice v\u011bt\u0161inou z\u00a0pra\u017esk\u00e9 politiky ode\u0161li, ale p\u0159\u00edsliby a dohody t\u00e9 doby nov\u00e9\u00a0 radnice dnes dob\u00edhaj\u00ed. \u017d\u00e1dn\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad, \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 gr\u00e9mia expert\u016f nemohou \u00a0z politik\u016f sejmout odpov\u011bdnost za\u00a0 z\u00e1sadn\u00ed rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed \u00a0o budoucnosti m\u011bsta. (Gr\u00e9mium 13-ti expert\u016f IPR)<\/p>\n

P\u0159edpoklad\u00a0 odpov\u011bdn\u00e9ho rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed je\u00a0 p\u0159\u00edprava kvalitn\u00edho podkladu a probl\u00e9mov\u00fdch anal\u00fdz pro politickou\u00a0 reprezentaci. Podklady pro rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0 mus\u00ed b\u00fdt nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 na lobbyingu (developer, majitel, stavebn\u00ed firma, projek\u010dn\u00ed management) i na pl\u00e1novac\u00ed ideologii samotn\u00fdch architekt\u016f.(At\u00e9nsk\u00e1 charta, Metropolitn\u00ed pl\u00e1n). V\u00a0Praze i \u00a0jinde je p\u0159edstaviteln\u00e9, \u017ee kone\u010dn\u00e9 projektov\u00e9 podklady pro \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159iprav\u00ed s\u00e1m investor. Tak jako v\u00a0N\u011bmecku nebo v Brit\u00e1nii, podle striktn\u011b stanoven\u00fdch po\u017eadavk\u016f m\u011bsta, kter\u00e9 op\u011bt p\u0159iprav\u00ed\u00a0 politici s\u00a0ve\u0159ejnost\u00ed a dokumentuje pl\u00e1novac\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ad.<\/p>\n

Velmi popul\u00e1rn\u00ed\u00a0 \u201earchitektonick\u00e1 sout\u011b\u017e\u201c je problematick\u00fd n\u00e1stroj v\u00fdb\u011bru z alternativ a autorsk\u00fd princip se ji\u017e v\u016fbec se nehod\u00ed pro urbanistickou pr\u00e1ci. \u00a0Pro\u00a0 sout\u011b\u017e na\u00a0 stavebn\u00ed\u00a0 soubory \u00a0je politika odpov\u011bdn\u00e1 za jasn\u00e9 a nezpochybniteln\u00e9 zad\u00e1n\u00ed, v\u010detn\u011b ceny stavby \u00a0a za v\u00fdb\u011br kompetentn\u00ed, \u00a0nezaujat\u00e9 a osv\u00edcen\u00e9 poroty. \u00a0Jak toto zajist\u00ed v\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9m prost\u0159ed\u00ed, je na del\u0161\u00ed \u00favahu.<\/p>\n

Pl\u00e1n lze ch\u00e1pat v troj\u00edm\u00a0 smyslu:<\/p>\n

1. Jako pl\u00e1n akce (road map) tedy cestu k\u00a0ur\u010den\u00e9mu \u00a0c\u00edli. Tedy. Mluvme o c\u00edli pl\u00e1nu, je koncentrovan\u00fd na probl\u00e9m, kter\u00fd\u00a0 je t\u0159eba \u0159e\u0161it. \u00a0Proto mus\u00ed\u00a0 ud\u011blat inventuru minul\u00fdch chyb a jejich pr\u016fniku do budoucnosti a m\u00edt k\u00a0dispozici detailn\u00ed informa\u010dn\u00ed z\u00e1kladnu pro, pokud mo\u017eno, kvalifikovan\u00e9 rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

2 Tradi\u010dn\u00ed \u00fazemn\u00ed\u00a0 pl\u00e1n je popisn\u00fd dokument st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edho stavu a ji\u017e rozhodnut\u00fdch z\u00e1m\u011br\u016f. \u00a0Modern\u00ed pl\u00e1n je po\u010d\u00edta\u010dov\u00e1 b\u00e1ze pro v\u0161echny vrstvy informac\u00ed\u00a0 o\u00a0 struktur\u00e1ch a\u00a0 funkc\u00edch\u00a0 m\u011bsta a jeho obyvatel, nejl\u00e9pe jako trojrozm\u011brn\u00fd model. (New York a dal\u0161\u00ed m\u011bsta).<\/p>\n

3. \u00dazemn\u00ed pl\u00e1n mus\u00ed revidovat\u00a0 50 let star\u00fd koncept silni\u010dn\u00ed infrastruktury \u2013 ZAKOS, a\u00a0 zpochybnit dikt\u00e1t\u00a0silni\u010dn\u00ed\u00a0 dopravy a ne \u00a0jen ml\u010dky akceptovat nov\u00e9 dopravn\u00ed tahy\u00a0 rozd\u011bluj\u00edc\u00ed m\u011bsto. Maximalizovan\u00e9 silni\u010dn\u00ed tahy i \u00a04 z\u00a0p\u011bti\u00a0\u00a0 megaprojekty most\u016f\u00a0 jsou\u00a0 zcela nebo \u010d\u00e1ste\u010dn\u011b bez\u00fa\u010deln\u00e9, prost\u0159ed\u00ed\u00a0 \u010dtvrt\u00ed devalvuj\u00edc\u00ed dar\u00a0 er\u00e1ru\u00a0 pro stavebn\u00ed lobby.<\/p>\n

3. Partnerem \u00a0tvorby pl\u00e1nu je i ve\u0159ejnost, kter\u00e1 pom\u00e1h\u00e1 definovat\u00a0 ve\u0159ejn\u00fd z\u00e1jem. \u00a0Platformy pro \u00fa\u010dast ve\u0159ejnosti v\u00a0prvn\u00edch f\u00e1z\u00edch pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed pat\u0159\u00ed k demokratick\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dasti na procesu rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed. V N\u011bmecku proto existuj\u00ed volen\u00e9 poradn\u00ed \u00a0v\u00fdbory ( \u201eBezirkausschuss\u201c).<\/p>\n

4.Metropolitn\u00ed pl\u00e1n IPR nespad\u00e1 do \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 z\u00a0t\u011bchto kategori\u00ed, \u00a0skute\u010dn\u00e9 a\u00a0 jedine\u010dn\u00e9 m\u011bsto p\u0159ekl\u00e1d\u00e1 do\u00a0 \u201eprogramu\u201c, kter\u00fd zjednodu\u0161uje a zobec\u0148uje \u00a0informa\u010dn\u00ed b\u00e1zi na z\u00e1klad\u011b vlastn\u00edch \u00a0krit\u00e9ri\u00ed. Kostky struktury m\u011bsta \u00a0jsou \u00a0\u010dty\u0159i druhy \u00a0lokality: ne podle m\u00edsta na map\u011b, ale podle \u201echarakteristick\u00e9 struktury\u201c z\u00e1stavby.<\/p>\n

Metropolitn\u00ed pl\u00e1n tak d\u011bl\u00e1 opak toho, co se od pl\u00e1nu o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1. Zobec\u0148uje a \u00a0interpretuje na z\u00e1klad\u011b vlastn\u00ed experiment\u00e1ln\u00ed\u00a0 logiky. To je smrteln\u00fd h\u0159\u00edch v\u00a0Praze, kde jsou stovky \u00fazemn\u00edch lokalit se\u00a0zcela jedine\u010dnou charakteristikou. \u010cty\u0159i pojmy: klasick\u00e1 z\u00e1stavba, modern\u00ed z\u00e1stavba (s\u00eddli\u0161t\u011b), voln\u00e9 rozvojov\u00e9 \u00fazem\u00ed a krajina (rozum\u011bj chr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edrodn\u00ed \u00fazem\u00ed) nepostihuj\u00ed rozmanitost m\u011bsta a v\u016fbec ne jeho probl\u00e9my. Lego m\u011bsta ze \u010dty\u0159 barev je urbanistick\u00e1 fikce nebo snad vize, kter\u00e1 deformuje a zaml\u017euje optiku vid\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho m\u011bsta. Tzv. pixelizace m\u011bsta je abstrakce ve smyslu automatizmu po\u010d\u00edta\u010dov\u00e9ho rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed. Koncept Metropolitn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu \u00a0ignoruje \u00a0\u00a0vyu\u017eit\u00ed a funkci budov, proto\u017ee ji m\u00e1 ve\u00a0struktu\u0159e m\u011bsta za nepodstatnou. \u00a0Ale stavby jsou p\u0159ece realizac\u00ed funk\u010dn\u00edho z\u00e1m\u011bru, kter\u00fd \u010dasto nelze bez destrukce m\u011bnit. \u00a0Architektura je jen sc\u00e9na , sko\u0159\u00e1pka, kostra a pro konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed lidsk\u00e9 \u00a0aktivity.\u00a0 Vize m\u011bsta \u00a0bez lid\u00ed je dehumanizace urbanizmu, tak, jak fungoval za totality. \u00a0P\u0159itom m\u011bsto je postaven\u00e9 na spolu\u017eit\u00ed jeho obyvatel ve v\u0161ech hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch, kulturn\u00edch a spole\u010densk\u00fdch form\u00e1ch a \u00a0ne na sk\u00e1le architektonick\u00e9 doktr\u00edny. Pro\u010d\u00a0 m\u00e1 v\u00a0svobodn\u00e9m politick\u00e9m syst\u00e9mu pokra\u010dovat\u00a0 vylep\u0161en\u00e1 metoda \u00a0Le Corbussiera a At\u00e9nsk\u00e9 charty?<\/p>\n

Praha se vyzna\u010duje vysokou m\u00edrou r\u016fznosti sv\u00fdch \u010dtvrt\u00ed a \u00a0lokalit, \u00a0p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm v\u00a0historick\u00e9m \u00fadol\u00ed Vltavy. Zde by m\u011bl b\u00fdt vzor pro n\u00edzkou m\u00edru entropie cel\u00e9ho m\u011bsta. \u00a0Pr\u00e1v\u011b r\u016fznorodost je\u00a0 charakteristikou i \u00a0z\u00e1rukou \u017eiv\u00e9ho prost\u0159ed\u00ed. Praha v\u00a0historick\u00e9m Vltavsk\u00e9m \u00fadol\u00ed je jedine\u010dn\u00e1, mnohovrstv\u00e1 a r\u016fznorod\u00e1 m\u011bstsk\u00e1 krajina.<\/p>\n

V\u00a0tomto smyslu nelze v\u00a0MP plochy z\u00e1stavbou podobn\u00e9 jednodu\u0161e v\u00a0posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed separovat, ale je t\u0159eba zohlednit souvislost se sousedstv\u00edm, dal\u0161\u00edmi vazbami \u00a0a s\u00a0m\u011bstskou krajinou. Proto pou\u017eit\u00ed terminu lokalita jako typus 4 druh\u016f \u00a0z\u00e1stavby nesed\u00ed. Vra\u0165me tedy pojmu Lokalita jej\u00ed vlastn\u00ed\u00a0 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed m\u00edsto na map\u011b v\u00a0MP i ve spr\u00e1v\u011b \u00fazem\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Berme i zastav\u011bn\u00e9 \u00fazem\u00ed jako krajinu, ostatn\u011b hovo\u0159\u00edme o krajin\u011b st\u0159ech a podobn\u011b \u00a0vn\u00edmejme i krajinu z\u00e1stavby. U\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9 je v\u00fd\u0161kov\u00e9 mapov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0 \u00fazem\u00ed \u00a0v\u00a0MP, jak\u00a0 z\u00e1kladn\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161ky \u00a0uli\u010dn\u00ed , tak v\u00fd\u0161ky z\u00e1stavby.<\/p>\n

Metoda n\u00e1hledu Vedut p\u0159edveden\u00e1 v \u00a0MP je “na nic”<\/em>, proto\u017ee neukazuje doty\u010dnou ikonickou vedutu, (na p\u0159. Hrad\u010dan, D\u00edv\u010d\u00edch hrad\u016f, V\u00edtkova, Kav\u010d\u00edch hor, Hanspaulky nebo Baby) v\u00a0relaci k\u00a0nov\u00e9 z\u00e1stavb\u011b, k jejich\u00a0 vz\u00e1jemn\u00e9 vzd\u00e1lenosti \u00a0a \u00a0vzd\u00e1lenosti od pozorovatele. Z\u00e1b\u011bry z\u00a0nekone\u010dna jsou\u00a0 nevypov\u00eddaj\u00edc\u00ed. Tak prost\u00e9 srovn\u00e1n\u00ed \u00a0v\u00fd\u0161kov\u00fdch hladin nen\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9mu\u00a0 n\u00e1hledu veduty\u00a0 podobn\u00e9. Bylo na\u00a0 m\u00edst\u011b m\u00edt 3D digit\u00e1ln\u00ed prostorov\u00fd model, v\u010detn\u011b obrazu uli\u010dn\u00edch front,\u00a0 kter\u00fd by bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 proch\u00e1zet tak, jako ho do sv\u00fdch map dovoluje zapracovat Google, na m\u00edsto 2D\u00a0 podoby MP.<\/p>\n

MP tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee Praha pro n\u00edzkou hustotu os\u00eddlen\u00ed nefunguje. Co nefunguje pl\u00e1n\u00a0 ne\u0159\u00edk\u00e1. Tato premisa\u00a0 prost\u011b \u00a0neplat\u00ed. Anglick\u00fd pojem \u201edensity\u201c je chybn\u011b ch\u00e1p\u00e1n jako hustota obyvatel na hektar nebo Km2 nebo jako kompaktn\u00ed objemn\u00e1 struktura z\u00e1stavby. \u00a0Zam\u011b\u0148uje ji s pojmem density jako \u00a0hustotu funkc\u00ed a \u010dinnost\u00ed.\u00a0 Kompaktn\u00ed\u00a0 z\u00e1stavba Lond\u00fdnsk\u00e9 City\u00a0 je krom\u011b \u017eiv\u00e9 pracovn\u00ed doby opu\u0161t\u011bn\u00e9 m\u011bsto s\u00a0malou hustotou obyvatel. I v \u00a0socialistick\u00fdch\u00a0 s\u00eddli\u0161t\u00edch se\u00a0 nepoda\u0159ilo\u00a0 vytvo\u0159it\u00a0 \u017eiv\u00e9 m\u011bsto, p\u0159es pom\u011brn\u011b vysok\u00e9 hustoty\u00a0 obyvatel. S\u00eddli\u0161tn\u00ed celky na okraji metropole jsou ale dnes garantem rentability ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 dopravy.<\/p>\n

Hustota z\u00e1stavby\u00a0 dle IPR je nab\u00eddkou\u00a0 levn\u011b investovat r\u016fstem hladin a z\u00e1stavbou ka\u017ed\u00e9 voln\u00e9 plochy nebo likvidac\u00ed tzv. p\u0159e\u017eil\u00fdch staveb. V\u00a0tomto duchu\u00a0 se z\u00e1sadn\u011b m\u011bn\u00ed i krajinn\u00fd r\u00e1mec plasticky modelovan\u00e9 morfologie Prahy.<\/p>\n

Metropolitn\u00ed pl\u00e1n nerespektuje\u00a0 stabilizovan\u00e1 \u00fazem\u00ed a ochrann\u00e9 z\u00f3ny jako nedotknuteln\u00e9, ani jako plochy se \u00a0z\u00e1vaznou regulac\u00ed. Tady jsme b\u00fdvali \u00a0sv\u011bdky selh\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0 a\u00a0 povolnosti pam\u00e1tkov\u00e9 ochrany i\u00a0 \u00fazemn\u00edho rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed. (Quadria, Karl\u00edn\u00a0 atd). Historick\u00e9\u00a0 d\u011bdictv\u00ed\u00a0 ji\u017e nelze\u00a0 jako v\u00a0dob\u011b pana Mgr. Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ednka \u00a0rozm\u011blnit a degradovat\u00a0 na\u00a0 rozvojov\u00e9\u00a0 \u00fazem\u00ed, bez ztr\u00e1ty kvality prost\u0159ed\u00ed, bonity\u00a0 a pov\u011bsti Prahy.<\/p>\n

Praxe se\u00a0se z\u00e1sadami Metropolitn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu rozch\u00e1z\u00ed, n\u011bkdy \u00a0pro jeho\u00a0 chybn\u00e9 nastaven\u00ed a jindy jako z\u00e1m\u011br zohled\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed lobbystick\u00e9 tlaky. \u00a0Bulv\u00e1r Letn\u00e1 \u2013 Pra\u0161n\u00fd most, ji\u017en\u00ed varianta okruhu, \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed Blanky,\u00a0 Kunratice , D\u017eb\u00e1n, Vidoule, Trojsk\u00fd most a dal\u0161\u00ed to dokl\u00e1daj\u00ed. Za totality p\u0159i\u00a0 velk\u00e9 svobod\u011b\u00a0 urbanizmu existovalo stejn\u00e9 m\u011bsto, ale\u00a0 s\u00a0jinou n\u00e1pln\u00ed a nulovou vlastn\u00ed dynamikou.\u00a0 Pro\u010d m\u00e1 b\u00fdt ale\u00a0 dnes, pohled IPR a \u00a0MP na m\u011bsto svobodn\u00fdch lid\u00ed \u00a0naz\u00edr\u00e1n prizmatem vrchnostensk\u00e9 pl\u00e1novac\u00ed\u00a0 doktr\u00edny? MP je\u00a0 zpracov\u00e1n geografickou metodou,\u00a0 p\u0159itom pot\u0159eby \u00a0\u00a0udr\u017eiteln\u00e9ho rozvoje m\u011bsta nelze redukovat na architektonicko-in\u017een\u00fdrskou \u00falohu. M\u011bsto je organizmus\u00a0 ze spoluexistence a interakce \u00a0lidsk\u00fdch \u00a0jedinc\u016f a skupin, hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch, \u00a0politick\u00fdch a kulturn\u00edch proces\u016f a z\u00e1jm\u016f. Ka\u017ed\u00fd rozvoj se mus\u00ed orientovat na aktivity a ne na struktury.<\/p>\n

MP pl\u00e1n je pl\u00e1novac\u00ed eskamot\u00e9rstv\u00ed\u00a0 mistrovsk\u00e9 t\u0159\u00eddy. Bere politik\u016fm z\u00a0ruky hork\u00fd brambor\u00a0 spolupr\u00e1ce s\u00a0lobbysmem,\u00a0 kdy\u017e\u00a0 spekulativn\u00edmu urbanizmu d\u00e1v\u00e1\u00a0 profesn\u00ed kab\u00e1t\u00a0 a tak iniciativu vrac\u00ed\u00a0 do rukou architekt\u016f,\u00a0 jako za totality. Prozat\u00edm se ukazuje, \u017ee c\u00edlem IPR\u00a0 je vytipov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0 velk\u00fdch rozvojov\u00fdch lokalit a\u00a0 pak rychl\u00e1\u00a0 zelen\u00e1 pro jejich \u010dasto neuv\u00e1\u017eenou a problematickou developerskou z\u00e1stavbu. (Zad\u00e1n\u00ed \u201e Koncep\u010dn\u00ed studie, Letn\u00e1-Pra\u0161n\u00fd most\u201c).<\/p>\n

To co z\u00a0Prahy , pro jej\u00ed malebnou krajinu ve Vltavsk\u00e9m \u00fadol\u00ed, \u010din\u00ed zna\u010dku kvality a\u00a0 ikonick\u00e9 m\u011bsto sv\u011btov\u00e9ho renom\u00e9, hroz\u00ed b\u00fdt prod\u00e1no pro\u00a0 kr\u00e1tkozrak\u00e9 podnikatelsk\u00e9 z\u00e1m\u011bry.<\/p>\n

Rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed o budoucnosti \u00a0Prahy m\u00e1 p\u0159ed sebou probl\u00e9my\u00a0 jako nevhodn\u00e9 \u00a0\u00a0dopravn\u00ed\u00a0 cesty (Blanka, Magistr\u00e1la) i \u00a0pokusy \u00a0developer\u016f d\u00e1vno vylobbovan\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edsliby realizovat.\u00a0 Pl\u00e1n rozvoje mus\u00ed p\u0159i nedostatku\u00a0 prost\u0159edk\u016f ur\u010dit\u00a0 priority \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed toho, co Praze chyb\u00ed. Jsou to u\u017e leta odkl\u00e1dan\u00e9 projekty jako spojen\u00ed na leti\u0161t\u011b, doprava p\u0159\u00edm\u011bstsk\u00e1, autodoprava, d\u00e1lni\u010dn\u00ed obchvat, kvalita\u00a0 prost\u0159ed\u00ed a \u00a0ochrana\u00a0 park\u016f a zelen\u011b pod tlakem velkoprojekt\u016f orientovan\u00fdch na kr\u00e1tkodob\u00fd zisk. V rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed mus\u00ed platit posouzen\u00ed ceny a funk\u010dn\u00ed \u00fa\u010delnosti a obecn\u00e9 p\u0159ijatelnosti \u00a0projekt\u016f, jejich posloupnosti a rentability i\u00a0 hroz\u00edc\u00ed \u0161kody nespr\u00e1vn\u00fdm vyu\u017eit\u00edm \u00fazem\u00ed. \u00a0V\u00fdstavba infrastruktury per partes m\u00edsto megaprojekt\u016f. \u00a0Pro \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed re\u00e1ln\u00fdch pot\u0159eb, deficit\u016f a v\u00fdzev\u00a0 m\u011bsta nebo posouzen\u00ed konkern\u00edch projekt\u016f m\u016f\u017ee m\u00edt MP jen pomocnou funkci.\u00a0 \u00dazemn\u00ed pl\u00e1n \u00a0je t\u0159eba, jako v\u00a0jin\u00fdch m\u011bstech, m\u00edt jako podklad\u00a0 st\u00e1l\u00fdch, \u010dasto \u00a0do budoucna nep\u0159edv\u00eddan\u00fdch prom\u011bn m\u011bsta. Pr\u00e1ci IPR na MP je t\u0159eba d\u00e1t limit a c\u00edl.<\/p>\n

Revize\u00a0 praxe IPR a koncep\u010dn\u00edch z\u00e1m\u011br\u016f jako je Bulv\u00e1r Letn\u00e1-Pra\u0161n\u00fd most, by m\u011bla b\u00fdt p\u0159edm\u011btem hlub\u0161\u00ed expertizy i \u00a0ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 debaty.<\/b><\/p>\n

Ji\u0159\u00ed Gebert<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>
<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 1,265 total views p\u0159etiskujeme p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek architekta Ji\u0159\u00edho Geberta k Metropolitn\u00edmu pl\u00e1nu Prahy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3478"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}