{"id":3725,"date":"2015-04-06T11:22:53","date_gmt":"2015-04-06T11:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=3725"},"modified":"2015-04-06T11:22:53","modified_gmt":"2015-04-06T11:22:53","slug":"jiri-gebert-soutez-smichov","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=3725","title":{"rendered":"Ji\u0159\u00ed Gebert: Sout\u011b\u017e Sm\u00edchov"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i>  956 total views<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

p\u0159etiskujeme text architekta Ji\u0159\u00edho Geberta komentuj\u00edc\u00edho architektonickou sout\u011b\u017e o nov\u00fd Sm\u00edchov, jak ji vypsal Institut pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed a rozvoje Prahy.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

IPR prezentuje koncepci z\u00e1stavby Sm\u00edchova podle v\u00edt\u011bzn\u00e9 architektonick\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee.\u00a0Je navr\u017eena v nejlep\u0161\u00edm duchu dikt\u00e1tu architektonicko-developersk\u00fdch p\u0159edstav t\u00e9to instituce.<\/p>\n

Vid\u00edm zde n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed nedostatky:
\n1. urbanistick\u00e1 studie, viz obr\u00e1zky na IPR port\u00e1lu, nem\u00e1 co navrhovat domy a jejich architekturu. Jsme tak op\u011bt u vysout\u011b\u017een\u00e9ho m\u011bsta, jako byla v\u011bt\u0161ina architekty ocen\u011bn\u00fdch, ale v realit\u011b bohu\u017eel deficitn\u00edch, s\u00eddli\u0161\u0165.
\n2. Radlick\u00e1 ulice a cel\u00e9 \u201e blokov\u00e9 s\u00eddli\u0161t\u011b\u201c tedy bude pokra\u010dovat ve v\u00fd\u0161ce st\u0159echy \u017densk\u00fdch domov\u016f. 7 pater opravdu nep\u0159ekro\u010d\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161ku z\u00e1stavby, ale p\u0159ekro\u010d\u00ed m\u00edru \u00fanosnosti \u00fazem\u00ed sm\u00edchovsk\u00e9 nivy vypln\u011bn\u00edm \u00fadoln\u00edho parteru.
\n3. Chyb\u00ed n\u00e1hled t\u0159eba z podolsk\u00e9ho n\u00e1b\u0159e\u017e\u00ed nebo z Vy\u0161ehradu k posouzen\u00ed z\u00e1sahu do krajiny b\u0159ehu a \u00fatvar\u016f jako Pav\u00ed vrch a D\u00edv\u010d\u00ed hrady, kter\u00e9 ztrat\u00ed dominantn\u00ed charakter.
\n4. Nov\u00fd ostrov z\u00e1stavby je Autobusov\u00fdm n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm odd\u011blen\u00fd od dne\u0161n\u00ed z\u00e1stavby. Bohu\u017eel se tu nena\u0161lo m\u00edsto pro souvislou parkovou \u00fapravu. Vztah k n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00ed Sm\u00edchov nen\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en.
\n5. Bloky z\u00e1stavby ulic orientovan\u00e9 sever-jih jsou s minim\u00e1ln\u00ed vnit\u0159n\u00ed plochou a tak pro bydlen\u00ed nevhodn\u00e9, t\u011bsn\u00e9 s minim\u00e1ln\u00edm oslun\u011bn\u00edm plochy dvora i byt\u016f. Dvory by m\u011bly b\u00fdt s parkovou kvalitou, pokud se odvol\u00e1vaj\u00ed na typ pra\u017esk\u00e9 blokov\u00e9 z\u00e1stavby. Tomu ale prostorov\u011b neodpov\u00eddaj\u00ed. Jde tedy zase snad jen o administrativn\u00ed blok s byty v horn\u00edch patrech?
\n6. Je tato n\u00e1pl\u0148 a struktura z\u00e1stavby vhodn\u00e1 nebo by zde mohlo b\u00fdt jin\u00e9 vyu\u017eit\u00ed? Koncertn\u00ed s\u00e1l, m\u00edsto pro sport a pr\u016fb\u011b\u017en\u00fd park? Pro\u010d to jde v jin\u00fdch evropsk\u00fdch m\u011bstech a v Praze ne?
\n7 Je vhodn\u00e9 d\u011blat si architektonick\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee bez \u00fa\u010dasti m\u011bstsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti? Nemyslim t\u00edm z\u00e1stupce stavebniho odboru, ale rozvahu provedenou na politick\u00e9 \u00farovni a ve spolupr\u00e1ci s n\u00e1zory ob\u010dan\u016f. Heslo \u201eParticipace\u201c.
\n8. Maj\u00ed se architekti a hlavn\u011b porotci podb\u00edzet developer\u016fm nebo maj\u00ed c\u00edtit empatii pro m\u011bsto a m\u00edsto a pro hodnoty, kter\u00e9 lze dogmaticky tak lehce p\u0159ehl\u00e9dnout? Sm\u00edchov je jedine\u010dn\u00e1 ji\u017en\u00ed br\u00e1na Prahy ve vltavsk\u00e9m \u00fadol\u00ed. Nen\u00ed jejich povol\u00e1n\u00edm podle sv\u00e9ho sv\u011bdom\u00ed jej br\u00e1nit?
\n9. N\u00e1vrh je v ostr\u00e9m protikladu k velkoryse navr\u017een\u00e9, otev\u0159en\u00e9 podolsk\u00e9 parkov\u00e9 plo\u0161e na prav\u00e9m b\u0159ehu Vltavy, realizovan\u00e9 podle arch. Engela. Za totality.
\n10. Metoda p\u0159\u00edpravy \u00fazem\u00ed Institutu pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed a rozvoje je ideologick\u00e1 retro-avantgardn\u00ed architektonick\u00e1 hra, kter\u00e1 je pro 21. stolet\u00ed a pro udr\u017eiteln\u00fd rozvoj m\u011bsta p\u0159ekonan\u00e1.
\nNa nekritick\u00fd postoj medi\u00ed jsme si zvykli.
\nJi\u0159\u00ed Gebert<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>
<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 956 total views p\u0159etiskujeme text architekta Ji\u0159\u00edho Geberta komentuj\u00edc\u00edho architektonickou sout\u011b\u017e o nov\u00fd Sm\u00edchov, jak ji vypsal Institut pl\u00e1nov\u00e1n\u00ed a rozvoje Prahy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3725"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}