{"id":906,"date":"2013-09-12T05:04:49","date_gmt":"2013-09-12T05:04:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=906"},"modified":"2013-09-24T05:01:54","modified_gmt":"2013-09-24T05:01:54","slug":"dum-na-vaclavskem-namesti-je-zase-o-krok-blize-zbourani","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/?p=906","title":{"rendered":"Koz\u00e1k\u016fv d\u016fm na V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9m n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed je zase o krok bl\u00ed\u017ee zbour\u00e1n\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i>  1,399 total views<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

\"Demonstrace<\/a><\/p>\n

Stavebn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ad Prahy 1 vydal \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed ve prosp\u011bch zbour\u00e1n\u00ed domu na V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9m n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed. Na stavebn\u00edm \u00fa\u0159adu Prahy 1 je ji\u017e i pod\u00e1na \u017e\u00e1dost o demoli\u010dn\u00ed v\u00fdm\u011br. Klub za starou Prahu zorganizoval petici ob\u010dan\u016f, kterou p\u0159edlo\u017eil zastupitelstvu Prahy 1, aby v\u011bc je\u0161t\u011b projednalo. \u00a0Zastupitelstvo Prahy 1 v\u0161ak z\u00e1m\u011br bourat Pra\u017eskou pam\u00e1tkovou rezervaci, pam\u00e1tkovou z\u00f3nu UNESCO podpo\u0159ilo.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Stavebn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ad Prahy 1 vydal \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed\u00a0ve prosp\u011bch zbour\u00e1n\u00ed domu na V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9m n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed<\/a>. Na str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch \u00fa\u0159adu je rozhodnut\u00ed ulo\u017eeno zde.<\/a> Na stavebn\u00edm \u00fa\u0159adu z\u00e1rove\u0148 u\u017e je pod\u00e1na \u017e\u00e1dost o demoli\u010dn\u00ed v\u00fdm\u011br. Klub za starou Prahu zorganizoval petici ob\u010dan\u016f, kterou p\u0159edlo\u017eil zastupitelstvu Prahy 1, aby v\u011bc je\u0161t\u011b jednou projednalo. \u00a0Ov\u0161em…<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Zastupitel\u00e9 Prahy 1 podpo\u0159ili zbour\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cituji z webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nek Klubu za starou Prahu: “Zastupitelstvo Prahy 1 dnes s dvouhodinov\u00fdm zpo\u017ed\u011bn\u00edm projednalo mo\u017enost z\u00e1chrany domu na V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9m n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed 47, za z\u00e1chranu se postavili 4, za demolici 6, zdr\u017eelo se 20 zastupitel\u016f.” <\/em><\/p>\n

\u0160okuj\u00edc\u00ed je zejm\u00e9na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee 20 zastupitel\u016f doslova zahodilo sv\u016fj hlas (zdr\u017eeli se). Sv\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed zd\u016fvodnili argumentem “\u017ee nemaj\u00ed ke kauze dostatek informac\u00ed<\/em>.” (SIC!) Po takov\u00e9 dob\u011b projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed a pot\u00e9, co ve\u0161ker\u00e9 dokumenty kauzy jsou voln\u011b dostupn\u00e9 na internetu<\/a> – a p\u0159esto\u017ee kompletn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpravu dostali jako podklad k jedn\u00e1n\u00ed. P\u0159esto\u017ee m\u011bli k dispozici stanovisko Ministerstva kultury<\/a>, kter\u00e9 \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee souhlas odd\u011blen\u00ed ochrany pam\u00e1tek Hl. m\u011bsta Prahy (podeps\u00e1n Mgr. Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ednek) bylo vyd\u00e1no v rozporu se z\u00e1konem. (Cituji ze stanoviska Ministerstva kultury:\u00a0\u201eZ\u00e1vazn\u00e9 stanovisko MHMP obsahuje vnit\u0159n\u00ed rozpor, kter\u00fd vede k jeho nez\u00e1konnosti. […] V\u0161echny stanoven\u00e9 podm\u00ednky, nejen p\u0159\u00edloha \u010d\u00edslo 6 ukazuj\u00ed, \u017ee ve v\u011bci \u017e\u00e1dosti m\u011blo b\u00fdt vyd\u00e1no rozhodnut\u00ed org\u00e1nu pam\u00e1tkov\u00e9 p\u00e9\u010de v p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b a nikoliv z\u00e1vazn\u00e9 stanovisko k realizaci z\u00e1m\u011bru.\u201c\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

P\u0159esto\u017ee m\u011bli zastupitel\u00e9 Prahy 1 stanovisko Sen\u00e1tu \u010cR, kter\u00fd po\u017eadoval p\u0159ehodnocen\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed z d\u016fvodu jeho nez\u00e1konnosti<\/a>. P\u0159esto\u017ee m\u011bli zastupitel\u00e9 k dispozici stanovisko minul\u00e9ho ombudsmana, kter\u00fd z\u00e1m\u011br odm\u00edtal, tak i stanovisko sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho ombudsmana, kter\u00fd rovn\u011b\u017e upozor\u0148oval na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byl poru\u0161en z\u00e1kon. Cituji z tiskov\u00e9 zpr\u00e1vy ombudsmana:\u00a0Je vytv\u00e1\u0159en stav, kdy ur\u010dit\u00fd celek \u010di\u00a0\u00fazem\u00ed po\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 pam\u00e1tkovou ochranu, av\u0161ak jednotliv\u00e9 objekty, kter\u00e9 tvo\u0159\u00ed jeho sou\u010d\u00e1st nikoliv. Jejich postupnou zm\u011bnou \u010di\u00a0odstran\u011bn\u00edm m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee\u00a0smysl pam\u00e1tkov\u00e9 ochrany \u00fazemn\u00edho celku bude vypr\u00e1zdn\u011bn.\u201c \u00a0<\/em>p\u00ed\u0161e se v tiskov\u00e9 zpr\u00e1v\u011b ombudsmana.\u00a0Pra\u017esk\u00fd magistr\u00e1t, odbor pam\u00e1tkov\u00e9 p\u00e9\u010de (podeps\u00e1n Mgr. Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ednek) podle ombudsmana poru\u0161il \u00a0z\u00e1kon v\u011bcn\u011b i procesn\u011b, v dne\u0161n\u00ed tiskov\u00e9 zpr\u00e1v\u011b se p\u00ed\u0161e: \u201e\u201eSituace, kdy spr\u00e1vn\u00ed org\u00e1n nep\u0159ihl\u00e9dne bez \u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9ho od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed k\u00a0n\u00e1zoru odborn\u00e9ho org\u00e1nu, a\u0165 ji\u017e st\u00e1tn\u00ed pam\u00e1tkov\u00e9 p\u00e9\u010de, nebo kter\u00e9hokoli jin\u00e9ho, pop\u00edr\u00e1 smysl existence t\u011bchto odborn\u00fdch instituc\u00ed.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

P\u0159esto\u017ee m\u011bli zastupitel\u00e9 k dispozici otev\u0159en\u00fd dopis t\u0159in\u00e1cti p\u0159edn\u00edch \u010desk\u00fdch odborn\u00edk\u016f na d\u011bjiny um\u011bn\u00ed a architekturu<\/a>, kte\u0159\u00ed precizn\u011b formulovali odborn\u00e9 argumenty pro zachov\u00e1n\u00ed domu a zejm\u00e9na pro zamezen\u00ed v\u00fdstavby urbanisticky nevhodn\u00e9ho obchodn\u00edho centra.<\/p>\n

Kdo jak hlasoval?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cituji zpr\u00e1vu Klubu za starou Prahu:\u00a0“Proti demolici byli Zelen\u00ed (p\u0159edkladatel\u00e9 bodu) a Kate\u0159ina Klasnov\u00e1, pro demolici byla ODS, kter\u00e1 se jedn\u00edm zastupitelem (Sk\u00e1la) v rozprav\u011b vyslovila, jak je ten nov\u011b navr\u017een\u00fd bar\u00e1k kr\u00e1sn\u00fd, a zdr\u017eeli se, \u010di nehlasovali TOP a \u010cSSD, proto\u017ee nev\u011bd\u011bli, jak se k tomu maj\u00ed postavit, aby si zachovali svoji politickou image. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 se ale uk\u00e1zalo, \u017ee se na jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nep\u0159ipravili a podklady nestudovali…”<\/em><\/p>\n

Podpo\u0159\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed protesty m\u00e9dia?<\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u010dkoliv tato ud\u00e1lost m\u00e1 z\u0159eteln\u011b nadm\u00edstn\u00ed v\u00fdznam (V \u010cR snad nen\u00ed symbolicky exponovan\u011bj\u0161\u00edho m\u00edsta ne\u017e je prostor V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9ho n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed u “Kon\u011b”) a p\u0159esto\u017ee se kontinu\u00e1ln\u00edch protest\u016f z\u00fa\u010dastnily v sou\u010dtu ji\u017e tis\u00edce lid\u00ed a p\u0159esto\u017ee petici proti bour\u00e1n\u00ed Koz\u00e1kova domu podepsalo p\u0159es 14 tis\u00edc lid\u00ed<\/a>, o ud\u00e1losti informovaly pouze lok\u00e1ln\u00ed pra\u017esk\u00e9 noviny<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Odpor bude pokra\u010dovat<\/strong><\/p>\n

Shoduj\u00ed se ob\u010dansk\u00e9 iniciativy, kter\u00e9 fakticky jako jedin\u00e9 h\u00e1j\u00ed Pra\u017eskou pam\u00e1tkovou rezervaci. Nejaktivn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed organizace v t\u00e9to kauze jsou Klub pro starou Prahu<\/a>, Praguewatch<\/a>,\u00a0Um\u011bleckohistorick\u00e1 spole\u010dnost<\/a>, ASORKD<\/a>, Ob\u010dansk\u00fd monitoring<\/a>. Chcete-li se o kauze dozv\u011bd\u011bt v\u00edce, sledujte jejich weby, pop\u0159\u00edpad\u011b se m\u016f\u017eete v r\u00e1mci sv\u00fdch \u010dasov\u00fdch mo\u017enost\u00ed zapojit do jimi organizovan\u00fdch akc\u00ed. Koncem tohoto t\u00fddne je pl\u00e1nov\u00e1na diskuse t\u00e9to kauzy v Sen\u00e1tu.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>
<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 1,399 total views Stavebn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ad Prahy 1 vydal \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed ve prosp\u011bch zbour\u00e1n\u00ed domu na V\u00e1clavsk\u00e9m n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00ed. Na stavebn\u00edm \u00fa\u0159adu Prahy 1 je ji\u017e i pod\u00e1na \u017e\u00e1dost o demoli\u010dn\u00ed v\u00fdm\u011br. Klub za starou Prahu zorganizoval petici ob\u010dan\u016f, kterou p\u0159edlo\u017eil zastupitelstvu Prahy 1, aby v\u011bc je\u0161t\u011b projednalo. \u00a0Zastupitelstvo Prahy 1 v\u0161ak z\u00e1m\u011br bourat Pra\u017eskou pam\u00e1tkovou rezervaci, pam\u00e1tkovou […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/906"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/obcanskymonitoring.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}